Are we arriving at the main event?

As part of a survey response used in this online article this summer, I wrote “…Disturbingly, we are beginning to look like a society that cannot predictably execute the routines of governing – and that does not engender faith in our economy. As long as ours seems to be in marginally better shape than others, we get by. Should we reach a point where that is no longer the case, the absence of commitment to do the work of government will be less of an embarrassing sideshow and more of an alarming main event. Budgeting is a foundational aspect of government, regardless of how minimal a state you prefer.”  If policymakers on both sides fail to find a way to work together, enough to raise the debt ceiling, we will indeed be at the main event.  The Wall Street Journal discusses why the debt ceiling is of greater concern to investors than the shutdown.  The Economist provides a perspective from across the pond.  So does the Financial Times with an update on the market response and how banks are preparing for the possibility of a default.

Rating agency Standard & Poors’ press release (10/2/2013) summarizes their estimate of the impact of the ongoing shutdown on the economy and points out the potential impact of the lack of federally-produced economic data on the Fed’s decision-making and their own ability to analyze the situation.  Their July 10 2013 analysis of US sovereign creditworthiness makes very useful reading – I commend it to you even though we have not gotten to the part of the class that deals with debt and ratings.  S&P report that their rating takes into account the risk that political ability to make progress on “fiscal consolidation” (i.e., reducing the structural imbalance between Federal spending and revenues, whether by expenditure policy changes, tax policy changes, or a combination) will continue to be limited due to Washington gridlock in a divided government:

The stable outlook indicates our view that some of the downside risks to our ‘AA+’ rating on the U.S. have receded to the point that the likelihood that we will lower the rating in the near term is less than one in three. We do not see material risks to our favorable view of the flexibility and efficacy of U.S. monetary policy. We believe the U.S. economic performance will match or exceed its peers’ in the coming years. We forecast that the external position of the U.S. on a flow basis will not deteriorate.

However, that is certainly not the same as saying that the government could default on its debt with impunity due to this gridlock; the next paragraph of the Outlook section continues:  

We believe that our current ‘AA+’ rating already factors in a lesser ability of U.S. elected officials to react swiftly and effectively to public finance pressures over the longer term in comparison with officials of some more highly rated sovereigns and we expect repeated divisive debates over raising the debt ceiling. We expect these debates, however, to conclude without provoking a sharp discontinuous cut in current expenditure or in debt service. [emphasis added] We see some risks that the recent improved fiscal performance, due in part to cyclical and to one-off factors, could lead to complacency. A deliberate relaxation of fiscal policy without countervailing measures to address the nation’s longer-term fiscal challenges could place renewed downward pressure on the rating.

At the end of the rating report you can see the rating history – S&P downgraded the unsolicited US sovereign debt rating in summer 2011 in response to the last episode of debt ceiling brinkmanship and ongoing inability to work productively on fiscal consolidation.


If you have “followed” the PADM 7230 course blog at any time in the past, you will continue to get updates about the course until you unsubscribe. I cannot unsubscribe you – you need to do this yourself.

IF YOU FOLLOWED THE BLOG BY ENTERING YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:  If you are receiving unwanted updates to this blog via email, please simply click on the Manage Subscriptions link at the bottom of the email which says “Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions” – you will then be able to unfollow the blog at the page which opens up (as well as any others you subscribed to using that email address).  It only takes a minute.

Note that if you subscribed to more than one course blog using different email addresses you will have to repeat this process using an email about a post to the other blog as well.

If you need more instructions view this pdf:   how_to_unsubscribe_blog

IF YOU HAVE A WORDPRESS ACCOUNT:  On the blog front page, on the left hand side under my picture, you will see the statement “Follow via email” and a link in parenthesis (manage). Click on the manage link and proceed to unsubscribe yourself. Voilà, no more course updates from this blog! You can see a screenshot of this below:

Screenshot of Manage link

This is just a screenshot of where the Manage link is located

Detroit – the decision

Largest municipal bankruptcy yet announced today:

NYTimes: Detroit Goes Bankrupt, the Largest City to Do So in U.S.

“The decision by the city, the cradle of America’s automobile industry and once the nation’s fourth-most populous, also marks the largest municipal bankruptcy filing in American history in terms of debt.”

Be careful! Online publishing has its own scams.

This trend is of great concern and soon to be newly-minted PhDs need to be aware of it. Do not submit a book proposal to a press without thoroughly checking it out, and talking to your advisor. Ditto for journals.

NYTimes: Scientific Articles Accepted (Personal Checks, Too)

A parallel world of pseudo-academia, with prestigiously titled conferences and journals that will print seemingly anything for a fee, has the scientific community alarmed.

Legislative update on Senate budget proposal from Tax Policy Center

Comments from the Tax Policy Center (nonpartisan) on Senate budget proposal, centering on tax expenditures that benefit the upper end of the income distribution – you will see a name you know from our class discussion of tax expenditures:

TaxVox blog – Tax Policy Center  (Joint project of Urban Institute and Brookings Institution) – “Why the tax cuts in the Senate budget don’t add up

Recent Fed actions re: the crisis; unemployment post-crisis – structural or cyclical?

Janet Yellen, now Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors (you remember her from the Budgets and Fiscal Policy module of our class) delivered these remarks on February 11, 2013 – an excellent and clear summary of the Fed’s dual mandate and its actions in response to the fiscal crisis as well as current stance.  I commend it to you.

Macroadvisers: MA’s Alternative Scenario: March 1 Sequestration

Here is a summary of a macroeconomic model’s prediction of March 1 sequester effects (from Macroeconomic Advisers LLC):

MA’s Alternative Scenario: March 1 Sequestration